![]() ![]() Do this by placing your Ns as forward and center as possible. Tempt your opponent to trade a B for a N. Trade them off if opponent gets into your territory. Position your Ns to neutrlaize those of your opponent. You cannot sit back and relax although your game will be better if you do not get nervous. When you play a computer engine, it is like playing Bobby Fischer in 1972. This is why it is important to practice beating an engine, because it does not make tactical mistakes. Just waiting for a mistake to win is not a good way. You have to go after the K! Don't be timid. He also did not focus his attack where the K was. Destroy your opponent's B-pair or you will never win the endgame! Today I watched a GM willingly give up a B for a N and he wound up with a lucky draw, being a pawn down. Knights are better in the opening but bishops are more useful in the end game, especially if you coordinate a pair of them. Game 19 is a good example of an overpowering attack on weakened K side. You have to use all your pieces in the attack. In game 16, Boris keeps attacking with his queen until he gives it up. Whatever side the Boris puts his K on, that is where you have to attack - with overwhelming force. So far, reviewing these games, I notice that what wins is not very subtle chess, but hard hitting aggressive tactics. I beat the Play Magnus app age 12 with black, which has rating of 2250. I see playing chess with people as a way of making friends, not enemies. Chess to me needs a philosophical justification and some major rules of etiquette. I am very interested in the psychology of chess and its players. The good thing is that when you blunder and lose, your number does not go down, so you risk nothing! I think the whole rating thing makes chess much less fun and distorts people's view of themselves, and others. I find that playing Boris improves my game and Boris is not annoying (unlike many opponents online). So better to play against a computer that does not blunder, at least very often. If you consider that even GMs make lots of mistakes, you have to admit that humans are overrated! If you win when your opponent makes a mistake, does this make you a better chess player? Not at all. Sure, this may explain why it is not so hard, but I just enjoy winning without stress! Boris is not so easy either. Stockfish has a very good endgame but you will only draw if you blindly take it's advice. Chess games can be very pretty when they are well fought by both sides. Boris' end game is not quite as good as a human chess expert. You can win however with the right spatial strategy, even without a sacrifice. ![]() Easier to win against a more aggressive player if you know what you are doing.īoris plays very good tactical chess. I also play, Boris level, which is more fun and easier than stockfish. These are mostly games I played against the computer using level 10 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |